Re: [hackers] [slstatus] battery_perc: Port to OpenBSD. || Aaron Marcher

From: Aaron Marcher <me_AT_drkhsh.at>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:10:51 +0100

Hello,

> If you're going to do this for every module for every OS you're
> planning on supporting, this is a bad start imho.

Well, i will only support Linux and OpenBSD - and almost half of the
modules is POSIX-compliant anyway.

> What would you think about rather separating objects to their OS
> directory and chose which to build/link at make time?

Will adding an additional separation layer or even directory structure
with duplicate code actually improve the readbility of the program?
Performance-wise it is the same.

Regards,
Aaron

-- 
Web: https://drkhsh.at/ or http://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion/
Gopher: gopher://drkhsh.at or gopher://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion
GPG: 0x7A65E38D55BE96FE
Fingerprint: 4688 907C 8720 3318 0D9F AFDE 7A65 E38D 55BE 96FE
Received on Tue Mar 20 2018 - 00:10:51 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Mar 20 2018 - 00:12:23 CET