On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 07:59:00PM +0200, David Demelier wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:34:08PM -0400, Christopher Drelich wrote:
> > In terms of bugs in dwm, there seems to be some listed in BUGS and
> > some in dwm.1, is this desired behavior or would it be better to have
> > them all in one place?
>
> That's true, the problem with the BUGS file is that it's not installed through
> the `make install` target. People will mostly just read the dwm manual page
> only.
>
> On the other hand, having BUGS file in the repo is easier to track and fix bugs
> rather than reading the raw dwm.1 file.
>
> In my opinion I think we should remove the bugs section from dwm.1 manual page
> and place a link through the git repository pointing at BUGS file, what do you
> think?
>
No, documentation should be readable offline.
--
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
Received on Mon May 07 2018 - 09:36:37 CEST