Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Quentin Rameau <quinq_AT_fifth.space>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:16:50 +0200

> On glibc, major, minor, and makedev are all defined in
> sys/sysmacros.h with types.h only including this for historical
> reasons. A future release of glibc will remove this behaviour,
> meaning that major, minor, and makedev will no longer be defined
> for us without including sysmacros.h.

Could you link to the source of that information?

Thanks.
Received on Mon Jul 02 2018 - 10:16:50 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Phillips: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"
Previous message: Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"
In reply to: David Phillips: "[hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"
Next in thread: David Phillips: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"
Reply: David Phillips: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"
Reply: Quentin Rameau: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH] [sbase] Include sysmacros.h directly rather than types.h"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jul 02 2018 - 10:24:25 CEST