On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 22:55:28 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> This is too intrusive, what's wrong with using a shell script to test
> the commands?
>
> The test framework is more complicated than most sbase commands.
>
> It would have been nice to discuss this in advance before writing a
> 1000 line patch that might not get merged.
>
Writing all tests in shell isn't the best idea I think.
This frameworks makes it easy to write test and it will
tell you everything you need to know to figure out what
failed. I believe that in the need this will reduce the
amount of test code. There are things that are difficult
to do in shell: for example create a terminal which is
need to test tty(1). Look for example at the tests in
https://github.com/maandree/base-util-tests, they aren't
that nice, and they even require bash(1), it would be
even worse with portable sh(1).
Received on Sun Jul 08 2018 - 00:12:08 CEST