On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 15:52:41 +0100
"Roberto E. Vargas Caballero" <k0ga_AT_shike2.com> wrote:
Dear Roberto,
> I would say, why 1048576 and not 1000? or 10000?.
> Is there a specific reason?
1048576 is 2^20, so it's not completely arbitrary, though the point
really stands as to why there's such a huge jump in size. Can you give
a little information about that, Ingo?
With best regards
Laslo
--
Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Mon Sep 24 2018 - 17:05:41 CEST