On Fri, 1 Nov 2019 02:24:45 +0100 (CET)
git_AT_suckless.org wrote:
Dear Michael,
> yes: Simplify, only support one argument
>
> The previous code was too difficult to decipher for such a simple
> tool.
> Since yes(1) is not specified in any standard and several
> well-known implementations only support a single argument, do the
> same here.
> Thanks to everyone who offered implementation suggestions in the
> hackers_AT_suckless.org email thread.
even though I wrote the previous code for yes(1), after more thought I
completely agree with this path! Thanks for taking your time to rewrite
it! :)
With best regards
Laslo
Received on Fri Nov 01 2019 - 10:47:28 CET