[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Chris Down <chris_AT_chrisdown.name>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:26:59 +0100

Chris Down writes:
>sigprocmask() only returns an error if you pass an invalid first
>argument, but we're using SIG_SETMASK as part of the userspace ABI
>contract, so that doesn't seem very relevant.

(One could make the same argument about sigaction(), of course -- that's mostly
just an EINTR habit.)
Received on Wed Jul 27 2022 - 16:26:59 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: explosion0mental_AT_gmail.com: "[hackers] [libsl][PATCH] die: exit: use EXIT_FAILURE intead of 1"
Previous message: NRK: "[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
In reply to: Chris Down: "[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Next in thread: NRK: "[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jul 27 2022 - 19:12:30 CEST