Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Chris Down <chris_AT_chrisdown.name>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:57:10 +0100

NRK writes:
>ping!
>
>In case this got lost in the noise :)

Thanks for the poke :-)

From my side, I've been running with this patch for a couple of weeks and
everything works fine, so I think it's good to go.
Received on Tue Aug 09 2022 - 22:57:10 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] Simplify client y-offset correction"
Previous message: Tom Schwindl: "[hackers] [ii] [PATCH] ii: Add a die() function to replace fprintf(3) + exit(3) calls"
In reply to: NRK: "[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Next in thread: Chris Down: "[hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Aug 09 2022 - 23:00:36 CEST