Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: NRK <
nrk_AT_disroot.org
>
Date
: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 16:24:36 +0600
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 09:37:58AM +0100, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
> I don't think there can be any zombies since it is run in setup() before any
> processes can spawn (via keybindings etc) or am I overlooking something
> obvious?
It was recently discussed here:
https://lists.suckless.org/hackers/2207/18424.html
And here's the original thread from 2009:
https://lists.suckless.org/dev/0908/0774.html
- NRK
Received on
Wed Jan 25 2023 - 11:24:36 CET
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Chris Down: "Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Previous message
:
Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
In reply to
:
Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Next in thread
:
Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Reply
:
Hiltjo Posthuma: "Re: [hackers] Re: [dwm][PATCH v2] Use sigaction(SA_NOCLDWAIT) for SIGCHLD handling"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Wed Jan 25 2023 - 11:24:35 CET