Re: [hackers] [PATCH 1/2] Add libutil/random.c for fast PCG-based PRNG
On Sat Dec 21, 2024 at 9:17 AM CET, NRK wrote:
> I don't really understand this ifdef. What does this get? Since you
> don't need cryptographic guarantees, it gets you pretty much nothing
> (while it does have costs since CSPRNG are often slower due to
> cryptographic nature).
>
> So this is just more code to get nothing in return. Not very suckless.
> And not sensible in general either IMO.
I agree.
Elie Le Vaillant
Received on Sat Dec 21 2024 - 12:06:54 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Dec 21 2024 - 12:12:44 CET