On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:56:23AM +0000, NRK wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:53:08AM +0900, yahei wrote:
> > If XBufferOverflow occuers, the client should recall the function with
> > the same event and a buffer of adequate size to obtain the string.
>
> Do you have any actual usecase where the current buffer size is a
> problem? If yes, I think it's better to increase the buffer size to
> something more reasonable if possible than to mess around with static
> variables.
>
> - NRK
>
Patch didn't attach correctly to my previous message.
--
Storkman
Received on Tue May 13 2025 - 22:18:45 CEST