[wiki] [sites] wiki updated

From: <hg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:03:57 +0000 (UTC)

changeset: 452:d18f847e57bf
tag: tip
user: arg_AT_localhost.localdomain
date: Thu Feb 18 11:03:55 2010 +0000
files: sta.li/faq.md
description:
typo fix


diff -r 532199418bf0 -r d18f847e57bf sta.li/faq.md
--- a/sta.li/faq.md Thu Feb 18 10:59:34 2010 +0000
+++ b/sta.li/faq.md Thu Feb 18 11:03:55 2010 +0000
_AT_@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 
 Also a security issue with dynamically linked libraries are executables with
 the suid flag. A user can easily run dynamic library code using LD_PRELOAD in
-conjunction with some trivial program like ping. Using a statically linked
+conjunction with some trivial program like ping. Using a static
 executable with the suid flag eliminates this problem completely.
 
 Apart from that we link against libraries with low footprint (eg uclibc instead
_AT_@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
 the slower it'll start, regardless if the libraries are preloaded or not.
 This also means that usually big static executables (which we try to avoid)
 easily outperform dynamic executables with lots of dependencies. If a big
-statically executable is already running, executed another one is nearly
+static executable is already running, executed another one is nearly
 instantaniously, because the payload is already in the memory. In the dynamic
 case the startup is not instantaniously because the dynamic linker has to make
 sure that there were no updates in the dependencies.
Received on Thu Feb 18 2010 - 12:03:57 CET