[wiki] [sites] wiki updated

From: <hg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:27:18 +0000 (UTC)

changeset: 709:d4830f5b617d
tag: tip
user: Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us>
date: Fri Mar 18 11:27:16 2011 +0000
files: sta.li/faq.md sta.li/index.md
description:
added link to interesting attack


diff -r 26fb44e31de5 -r d4830f5b617d sta.li/faq.md
--- a/sta.li/faq.md Fri Mar 18 10:42:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/sta.li/faq.md Fri Mar 18 11:27:16 2011 +0000
_AT_@ -81,6 +81,9 @@
 of lesser vulnerabilities, simply because lesser code contains fewer bugs from
 a statistical point of view.
 
+See also:
+* [On the Effectiveness of Address-Space Randomization](http://benpfaff.org/papers/asrandom.pdf)
+
 Aren't statically linked executables consuming more memory?
 --------------------------------------------------------
 We believe that due to the small size of the base system the opposite will be
_AT_@ -132,5 +135,5 @@
 --------
 * <http://teddziuba.com/2008/09/a-web-os-are-you-dense.html>
 * <http://www.nth-dimension.org.uk/pub/BTL.pdf>
+* [On the Effectiveness of Address-Space Randomization](http://benpfaff.org/papers/asrandom.pdf)
 
-
diff -r 26fb44e31de5 -r d4830f5b617d sta.li/index.md
--- a/sta.li/index.md Fri Mar 18 10:42:47 2011 +0100
+++ b/sta.li/index.md Fri Mar 18 11:27:16 2011 +0000
_AT_@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
 * [ldd arbitrary code execution](http://www.catonmat.net/blog/ldd-arbitrary-code-execution/) - Nice exploit
 * [static linking](http://blog.garbe.us/2008/02/08/01_Static_linking/) - My old blog entry
 * [blog post about stali](http://elevenislouder.blogspot.com/2010/02/stali.html)
+* [On the Effectiveness of Address-Space Randomization](http://benpfaff.org/papers/asrandom.pdf)
 
 Credit
 ------
Received on Fri Mar 18 2011 - 12:27:18 CET