[wiki] [sites] Correct two writing mistakes || Neven Sajko

From: <git_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 04:20:29 +0100

commit b6553c983e412e6466463bfa75c0c1ba357b55c6
Author: Neven Sajko <nsajko_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri Dec 26 04:17:38 2014 +0100

    Correct two writing mistakes
    
    A phrase used mistakenly and a spelling mistake.

diff --git a/sta.li/faq.md b/sta.li/faq.md
index 60a167d..c827db6 100644
--- a/sta.li/faq.md
+++ b/sta.li/faq.md
_AT_@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ So all in all dynamic executables are painfully slow, regardless of what
 inelegant hacks people came up with in the past. There is zero evidence that
 dynamic linking makes executables faster. There is only some evidence that
 preloading dynamic libraries vs not preloading dynamic libraries improves the
-startup of dynamic executables. But the introduction of preloading comes to a
+startup of dynamic executables. But the introduction of preloading comes at a
 cost as well, the kernel will have to do much more work when supporting such
 contrivances.
 
-Dynamic linking also greately increases the complexity of the kernel VM and
+Dynamic linking also greatly increases the complexity of the kernel VM and
 makes it much slower. And kludgy solutions to this make things more
 complicated and add many more points of total failure.
 
Received on Fri Dec 26 2014 - 04:20:29 CET