On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:17:29PM +0100, zimba-tm wrote:
> About mercurial. I'm interested to know what reasons made you switch
> to mercurial. Is it just a personal taste or does it have major
> improvements over darcs ? I don't know for you, but I found that the
> upgrades where very slow on my machine comparing to darcs. It's not a
> complain, I'm just curious :-)
mercurial performs much better than darcs which gets more and
more slow the more patches/changesets the repository contains.
Please don't use the deprecated old-http based cloning method,
which is really slow, use the method described in the wiki.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon Dec 19 2005 - 15:19:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:59:39 UTC