On Jan 23, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:03:47PM -0500, John Nowak wrote:
>
>> On Jan 23, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Juanval wrote:
>
>>> I've just compiled it in an x86_64, and although there are some
>>> warnings regarding different variable sizes [1], and a couple of
>>> warnings regarding static linking [2], it compiles fine.
>
>> FWIW, I'm getting the same thing on PPC linux distributions. I
>> assume this is already known.
>
> That's strange. Certainly sizeof(*int) != sizeof(int) on 64-bit
> systems,
> but I wouldn't have expected it on PPC32...
Sorry, I may have made that up upon further review. I am getting the
static linking errors. I am not sure about the size. The fact that he
put the numbers after the errors he was having instead of before
must've crossed my brain somehow.
Apologies for that... I realize wrongly reported bugs are worse than
unreported bugs.
- John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:59:50 UTC