Re: [wmii] removing 9base dependency, depending on plan9port as option, switching back to sh?

From: Steffen Liebergeld <perl_AT_gmx.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:28:05 +0100

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:47:42 +0100, "Anselm R. Garbe" <garbeam_AT_wmii.de> said:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Why not installing 9base to /tmp/9 in your
>> case?
>>
>> because every reasonably sophisticated distribution cleans /tmp
>> while the systems boot-procedures.

> I know, but doing cd $HOME/9base && sudo make install after each
> reboot doesn't hurt much, if the system sucks. The only reason which
> might hurt would be if /tmp is mounted with noexec option.

sudo is no option. At the moment the easiest thing is to use ratpoison
and wait for better hardware (local and remote).

-- 
Microsoft is simply one example of a proprietary software developer, a
software developer that tries to subjugate users to keep them divided
and helpless. -- Richard M. Stallman
Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 15:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:12 UTC