Re: [wmii] removing 9base dependency, depending on plan9port as option, switching back to sh?

From: Steffen Liebergeld <>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:28:05 +0100

On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:47:42 +0100, "Anselm R. Garbe" <> said:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:43:27PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > Why not installing 9base to /tmp/9 in your
>> case?
>> because every reasonably sophisticated distribution cleans /tmp
>> while the systems boot-procedures.

> I know, but doing cd $HOME/9base && sudo make install after each
> reboot doesn't hurt much, if the system sucks. The only reason which
> might hurt would be if /tmp is mounted with noexec option.

sudo is no option. At the moment the easiest thing is to use ratpoison
and wait for better hardware (local and remote).

Microsoft is simply one example of a proprietary software developer, a
software developer that tries to subjugate users to keep them divided
and helpless. -- Richard M. Stallman
Received on Fri Feb 24 2006 - 15:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:12 UTC