On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:02:45AM -0800, Anthony Martin wrote:
> garbeam_AT_wmii.de once said:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:05:11AM -0800, Anthony Martin wrote:
> > > ality_AT_pbrane.org once said:
> > > > I might be wrong, but shouldn't the test on line 604 of cmd/wm/fs.c be
> > > > inverted? As it stands right now, the page is removed but we're still
> > > > given the "permission denied" error. Maybe I'm missing something.
> > >
> > > Hmm. I was wrong about the test being inverted. After looking at the
> > > code for destroy_page(), I realized that it shouldn't return p if
> > > everything went smoothly.
> > >
> > > However, I'm still not sure why it was giving me the "permission denied"
> > > error even after removing the page.
> >
> > In the meantime I changed that crappy signature to something
> > more useful.
>
> Works correctly now. Thanks :)
>
> I was wondering if you planned on implementing the page remove feature
> as a shortcut (i.e. $MODKEY-Control-r,y) or an action like in wmii-2.5.
> Right now I have it set up in my wmiirc as a shortcut but I
> wanted to know your view on the matter.
Yes, this shortcut will follow soon.
> Oh, one more thing .. should I be posting these to the mailinglist
> instead of emailing them directly to you?
wmii_AT_wmii.de, I cc'ed your mail.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:32:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:00:17 UTC