On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 04:07:41AM -0400, Kris Maglione wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:57:53AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> >We already had this. Please don't clutter the wm with such kind
> >of stuff. The current wmiimenu approach is much more simplier
> >and can be used without 9P as well. I don't want that change.
> >There is no single sane reason why this would be more
> >advantageous. You can access the 9P service to build up menu
> >lists, that's all we need.
> Like I said, I'll write it as a patch. The idea as it's been presented
> iterests me because the latency of starting a menu is unbearable at times.
> I've often enough wound up entering an entire tag name in vim before the
> menu has opened and I'm opened to exploring any available way to avoid it.
If there are any performance issues, we should investigate to
eliminate them. But for me the menu has been quite responsible
so far... It might be related that my /tmp is a tmpfs...
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Sat Jun 24 2006 - 10:22:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:10:06 UTC