On 2006/10/12_AT_08:53, <Anselm R. Garbe> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:47:49AM +0200, csant wrote:
> > >On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 07:15:14PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> > >>Oh, and forgot to mention all the broken mail sorting rules, email
> > >>accounts, etc, etc, etc.
> > >
> > >You are too pessimistic. If you'd invest the time you complain
> > >about the situation into being productive and updating existing
> > >links which haven't been updated yet
> >
> > The problem aren't the links he or you can update - it's more all those
> > online articles/reviews/whatnot that certainly will not be updated. A
> > typical user reads something, wants to check it out, gets a broken link,
> > thinks "oh well, another dead project". Few will think "and yet - I will
> > find it!" and start googling.
>
Anselm> For those cases I can agree, but those who are really
Anselm> interested will google or visit freshmeat. I doubt that most
Anselm> will think "another dead project" without googling...
Why no reclaim the domain, announce retirement on the site and redirect.
or just cname it till everyone is happy with the retirement. (one year
wont cost more than 10USD)
my two cents ..
//mauro//
Received on Thu Oct 12 2006 - 09:05:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:14:58 UTC