On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:09:00PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 03:02:49PM +0100, Mathieu L. wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:49:09PM +0100, thomas wrote:
> > > my 2 ¢: every editor lets me type in german or french with an azerty
> > > keyboard but acme: it has no support for dead keys -- blöd/bête. (That
> > > is way more annoying as the lack of syntax highlighting to me.)
> >
> > Doh, really no dead keys support in acme?? For a tool running on a
> > system coded by the guys who devised utf-8, that seems odd...
>
> I don't think it is the concern of an editor to care about key
> mappings.
Agreed, but if in the end there's no dead keys support, there still is a
problem somewhere, no matter which component's fault it is in the
chain...
Note that I only tried a few times acme on Plan 9, so I don't even know
if that "missing dead keys" claim is true, or if that is simply a matter
of configuration.
Or maybe Thomas was talking about acme from the plan9port?
Cheers,
Mathieu.
-- GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net: KeyID: | Fingerprint: 683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3 --Received on Fri Jan 19 2007 - 15:28:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:19:20 UTC