Re: [wmii] Bug: undefined "wi_getfuns" in wmiirc

From: sqweek <sqweek_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:59:48 +0800

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 6:40 PM, Alex Kilgore <adkilgor_AT_spartan.uncg.edu> wrote:
>> This only affects users of the sh-based wmiirc. The result is that the
>> Actions menu ($MODKEY-a) doesn't include any shell-defined Actions
>> (quit/exec/rehash/status), only files from $WMII_CONFPATH.
>
> I can confirm this, and i was wondering,
> I think this might have been asked before, but im still not sure, is
> there a reason we still have two options for rc script? is there any
> advantage to either rc.wmii or wmiirc besides the way they are written?

 Just dependencies. We[1] developers prefer rc.wmii but provide wmiirc
so that people can use wmii without installing p9p.

[1] I feel a bit silly calling myself a developer considering my
miniscule contribution, but it seemed the least awkward way to phrase
it. :)

-sqweek
Received on Thu May 29 2008 - 16:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:43:14 UTC