Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

From: Kris Maglione <>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:29:42 -0400

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:24:36AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>O.K. Sorry for poking half-baked one. Like you said, separating X11
>dep is a way to go.
>BTW I also interested in p9p's AUTOLIB approach, so any technical
>reasons why you didn't embed/get library dependency into/from source
>files themselves? A while ago, I did grep #included X11 headers in
>wmii source code to see real X11 dep b/c X11 was becoming modular, and
>I got it.

I've considered it in the past, and I'll probably do something
like it when I update the makefiles. It's simple enough.

Kris Maglione
Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers
is, of course, in a state of sin.
	--John von Neumann
Received on Mon May 25 2009 - 17:29:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 25 2009 - 17:36:02 UTC