Re: [dev] make framework for wmii

From: Uriel <>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 13:31:08 +0200

Why not just use mk and be done with it? All the time wasted
struggling with makefiles could be spent in more productive things,
and it would help spread mk, which would be a very good thing.



On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Kris Maglione <> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:24:36AM +0900, KIMURA Masaru wrote:
>> O.K. Sorry for poking half-baked one. Like you said, separating X11
>> dep is a way to go.
>> BTW I also interested in p9p's AUTOLIB approach, so any technical
>> reasons why you didn't embed/get library dependency into/from source
>> files themselves? A while ago, I did grep #included X11 headers in
>> wmii source code to see real X11 dep b/c X11 was becoming modular, and
>> I got it.
> I've considered it in the past, and I'll probably do something like it when
> I update the makefiles. It's simple enough.
> --
> Kris Maglione
> Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers
> is, of course, in a state of sin.
>        --John von Neumann
Received on Sun May 31 2009 - 11:31:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun May 31 2009 - 11:36:01 UTC