My redundancy is better than yours!
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:53:15AM +0000, Martin Swift wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:25:18AM +0200, Uriel wrote:
> > Somebody thought breaking gnome was a problem rather than a feature,
> > my comment was *not* universally redundant.
>
> It's not entirely clear what you mean by "universally" redundant. On
> the other hand, it doesn't really matter. You're wrong anyway.
>
> The comment made about your statement that '"broken gnome" is
> redundant' was to the effect that (whatever other people may think
> about gnome, whether you think it was broken by design or was broken
> by someone) since your opinions on the topic are (all too?) well known
> to list members, your reply was redundant.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
Received on Sun Sep 20 2009 - 12:15:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 20 2009 - 13:00:02 UTC