Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word processing solution-2)

From: Tor Aqissiaq <toraqissiaq_AT_googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:39:47 +0100

What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior?

On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe <anselm_AT_garbe.us> wrote:
> 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq <toraqissiaq_AT_googlemail.com>:
>> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and
>> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve
>> XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE
>> refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTML. I
>> already use XHTML for sending documents to my friends.
>
> XHTML is a sick child that will die soon.
>
> Kind regards,
> Anselm
>
>
Received on Sun Oct 18 2009 - 17:39:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 18 2009 - 17:48:04 UTC