[2009-11-05 04:18] Kris Maglione <maglione.k_AT_gmail.com>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:13:56AM +0000, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> >
> >Yes it's a shame. I think a suckless editor would simply be some kind
> >of a viewer that integrates the real ed. In a sense vi done right.
>
> It's called Sam.
The problem with sam is that it depends on a graphical display. If
there is none available it's just like ed (with some extensions).
As ed lives everywhere, while sam does not, I rather user ed.
meillo
Received on Thu Nov 05 2009 - 10:15:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Nov 05 2009 - 10:24:09 UTC