On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy <crap_AT_wzff.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 05:59:19PM +0100, Preben Randhol wrote:
>> Syntactically the language seems a bit confusing at first and
>> unfortunately too similar to C.
>
> It looks a like a messy mix of C and pascal. Would be better
> without the pascal part.
Why people keep comparing it for pascal based on a *single* character
used in a quite neat feature, the := operator.
Talk about simplistic and superficial perceptions...
uriel
Received on Sun Nov 15 2009 - 05:16:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 15 2009 - 05:24:02 UTC