Re: [dev] [OT] [OT]: Go programming language

From: pmarin <pacogeek_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:58:54 +0100

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Uriel <lost.goblin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dmitry Maluka <dmitrymaluka_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> You don't need to replace something that is useless and evil, as Go
> shows. Just like Plan 9 didn't "replace" root and suid (or at least
> not directly).
>
> The C preprocessor has been pretty much ignored by any decent C
> programmer for decades now, getting rid of it in Go is a non-issue.
>
> uriel

The only decision about the preprocessor is to not include it in the
specification, go doesn't impede you to use an external preprocesor.
Received on Sun Nov 15 2009 - 10:58:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 15 2009 - 11:00:16 UTC