Re: [dev] [surf] please recheck tip

+1

Gottox. Can u review it?

On May 25, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Nibble <nibble.ds_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> For the moment I've done a little patch (against tip) that fixes the
> recently removed "wget download" feature, and also allows to download
> files using the "Download linked file" entry in the popup menu. It
> would be easy change the DOWNLOAD(p) macro to use another download
> manager.
>
> Kind regards,
> -- nibble
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 15:41:24 +0200
> pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/25/10 15:24, Josh Rickmar wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 04:06:00PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also, is there a better way of doing cookies then wget? As an
>>>>> (Open)BSD user, I'd like to use something in base (I did install
>>>>> wget though to test to make sure that wasn't the download problem
>>>>> above).
>>>> IIRC you can use ftp(1) for HTTP requests.
>>>>
>>> Thanks, I knew about (and use) ftp(1), but didn't think it would
>>> work with cookies. However, after checking the manpage, I see that
>>> it does support them with the -c flag.
>>>
>>>
>> Why dont distribute a shellscript that gets URL+cookie as arguments,
>> and let the users implement their own methods like using wget, ftp,
>> curl, firefox* or whatever
>>
>> * = yeah, using surf for browsing and firefox for download is the
>> most
>> retarded idea i can think of xD.. but surely..opening xterm or having
>> a way to display all wgets in a single xterm would be good (dvtm?)
>>
>> Having a suckless download manager can be good. just few locs in sh.
>>
>> --pancake
>>
>
> <surf.diff>
Received on Tue May 25 2010 - 18:46:11 UTC