Re: [dev] [surf] please recheck tip

From: Enno Boland (Gottox) <gottox_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:33:51 +0200

The patch looks quite good. Applied. Thanks! :)

2010/5/25 Nibble <nibble.ds_AT_gmail.com>:
> For the moment I've done a little patch (against tip) that fixes the
> recently removed "wget download" feature, and also allows to download
> files using the "Download linked file" entry in the popup menu. It
> would be easy change the DOWNLOAD(p) macro to use another download
> manager.
>
> Kind regards,
> -- nibble
>
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 15:41:24 +0200
> pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05/25/10 15:24, Josh Rickmar wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Claudio M. Alessi wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 04:06:00PM -0400, Josh Rickmar wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Also, is there a better way of doing cookies then wget?  As an
>> >>> (Open)BSD user, I'd like to use something in base (I did install
>> >>> wget though to test to make sure that wasn't the download problem
>> >>> above).
>> >> IIRC you can use ftp(1) for HTTP requests.
>> >>
>> > Thanks, I knew about (and use) ftp(1), but didn't think it would
>> > work with cookies.  However, after checking the manpage, I see that
>> > it does support them with the -c flag.
>> >
>> >
>> Why dont distribute a shellscript that gets URL+cookie as arguments,
>> and let the users implement their own methods like using wget, ftp,
>> curl, firefox* or whatever
>>
>> * = yeah, using surf for browsing and firefox for download is the most
>> retarded idea i can think of xD.. but surely..opening xterm or having
>> a way to display all wgets in a single xterm would be good (dvtm?)
>>
>> Having a suckless download manager can be good. just few locs in sh.
>>
>> --pancake
>>
>
>
Received on Wed May 26 2010 - 13:33:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 26 2010 - 13:36:03 UTC