Re: [dev] Interesting post about X11

On 16 Jun 2010, at 17:34, David Tweed wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Will Light <visinin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> but the notion of a browser-based terminal
>> for a local machine just seems ridiculous...and that's a mild
>> example!
>> a browser-based music sequencer or video editor, for example, is so
>> far off that it's just impractical.
>
> Just to provide some context: this probably isn't the fully featured
> video editor that you were talking about, and it appears not to use
> NaCl but do everything remotely, but clearly a web-based video editor
> exists:
>
> http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2010/06/youtube-video-editor.html

It uses Flash, does that count? I don't know quite what it uses Flash
for, mind.

hmm... Inferno exists as an IE plugin already, I wonder what it would
take to make a nacl version. Just musing, mindlessly. :)

>
> --
> cheers, dave tweed__________________________
> computer vision reasearcher: david.tweed_AT_gmail.com
> "while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." --
> attempted insult seen on slashdot
>

-- 
Complexity is not a function of the number of features. Some features  
exist only because complexity was _removed_ from the underlying system.