Re: [dev] progress

From: Corey Thomasson <>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:20:27 -0400

On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <> wrote:
>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files,
>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted.
> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure.
>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution
>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to
>>wherever its looking now.
> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all,
> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some
> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack
> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new
> makefile.

there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header
files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors.

> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been mentioned
> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post
> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info?
> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For
> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually
> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right?
Received on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 14:20:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Oct 13 2010 - 14:24:02 CEST