[dev] Re: sta.li progress

On 10/28/10 01:16, Jacob Todd wrote:
> If someone was going to create a "suckless" libc, they shouldn't support
> posix. start with the plan 9 libraries instead of the obsd while you're at
> it.
>
I understand that the idea is to compile other shit, not suckless
software, or else we could just use the plan9 libc.
Why is it no one (besides some niche projects and p9p) itself actually
uses the p9p libc?
Received on Thu Oct 28 2010 - 01:38:07 CEST