On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Joseph Xu <josephzxu_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> came up with. It relies on the shell that executes st to parse the
> arguments, so you can't run a command like st -e "touch arst", you have
> to run st -e touch arst. This also means you can't have any st arguments
> after the -e because they'll all be included in the command to run.
This breaks argument parsing. Why would you want to do that?
Josh's solution is better imo. I've pushed (a slight variation of) it to tip.
Received on Sun Nov 28 2010 - 12:22:15 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 28 2010 - 12:24:02 CET