Re: Suckless sh [Was: Re: [dev] New utility]

From: Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 14:54:02 +0100

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:33:51 +0200
Jens Staal <staal1978_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/9/25 Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm>:
> > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:07:52 +0200
> > Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net> wrote:
> ...
> > There are only two implementations of rc that I know of, and one is
> > brain-damaged and best ignored. I've found it a remarkably elegant
> > language, although it is possible an even smoother shell could be
> > devised.
> >
>
> what about oh shell written in go?
>
> https://github.com/michaelmacinnis/oh
>
> AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50007
>

Well, that object system worries me. It looks like a tool optimized for
building huge amounts of interlocking bullshit on top of the shell.

It's redirection and the behaviour of cp & mv when the last arg is a
dir that bother me, in rc.
Received on Sun Sep 25 2011 - 15:54:02 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 25 2011 - 16:00:06 CEST