Re: [dev] Formatting emails

From: Christoph Lohmann <20h_AT_r-36.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:51:33 +0200

Greetings,

touch your own nose.


Sincerely,

Christoph Lohmann


Sent while having a nice shit.
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Oct 3, 2011 12:15 PM, Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:11:44PM +0200, Jakub Lach wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Dnia 3 pa┼║dziernika 2011 18:03 Petr Sabata &lt;contyk_AT_redhat.com&gt;
> napisał(a):
>> &gt; On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:37:15PM +0000, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> &gt; &gt; On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
> &lt;eekee57_AT_fastmail.fm&gt; wrote:
>> &gt; &gt; &gt; On another note entirely, would you mind not wraping your
> text so wide,
>> &gt; &gt; &gt; please? My eyes aren't too good so I use larger text, and
> anything
>> &gt; &gt; &gt; wrapped over about 75-80 columns double-wraps which is
> unpleasant to
>> &gt; &gt; &gt; read. It's not just you, there's quite a few people wrapping
> their
>> &gt; &gt; &gt; emails too wide.
>> &gt; &gt; &gt;
>> &gt; &gt; fmt(1)
>> &gt; &gt;
>> &gt; &gt; Can we unify our evangelist forces and standardize on a message
>> &gt; &gt; format? What about RFC 2646: text/plain; format=flowed?
>> &gt; &gt; Embedding any more formatting characters in emails than strictly
>> &gt; &gt; necessary sucks, and autogenerated HTML sucks hard.
>> &gt; &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt; +1
>>
>
> Bam, Jakub is excluded from the debate.
>
> Incidentally, while we're trying to be fascist about email
> style, I hate 'contributions' of +1.
>
Received on Mon Oct 03 2011 - 18:51:33 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 03 2011 - 19:00:04 CEST