Re: [dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Nick <suckless-dev_AT_njw.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:37:21 +0100

Quoth Sime Ramov:
> Hello. I need to keep track of one remote Nagios instance output, which
> excludes cnagios[1].

Why not just get it to email you on state changes?

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Sun Oct 16 2011 - 21:37:21 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sime Ramov: "Re: [dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?"
Previous message: u_AT_netbeisser.de: "Re: [dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?"
In reply to: Sime Ramov: "[dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?"
Next in thread: Sime Ramov: "Re: [dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?"
Reply: Sime Ramov: "Re: [dev] Suckless way of checking Nagios?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Oct 16 2011 - 21:24:03 CEST