Re: [dev] Introducing SEE, the Simple Executing Engine

From: Xinhao Yuan <xinhaoyuan_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 20:55:52 +0800

__sa is an old magic to specify the size of gc_header_s, I removed it
in the recent commit.

For newlisp, I noticed it before. I think one of the difference is
that newlisp is trying to provide a completed I/O routines set, while
SEE is not. SEE may be considered minimalistic :)

And there is no x86_64 environment for me :(, I may try to create a
x86_64 VM to fix the potential bugs in the code.

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com> wrote:
> More notes:
> - add a space between -o and the filename when linking. This is also breaking the build.
>
> - defining gcheader foo to 24 makes the build happen, but full of pointer/int warnings which i imagine this is just wrong pointer arithmetics that will result in segfaults.
>
> - im also seeing wrong format strings like using %x instrad of %p ..
>
> - make clean fails
>
> Im not going to execute something that the compilers says its wrong at first place. The idea looks cool but needs a big cleanup in order to make it happy with pointers and be 64bit friendly.
>
> - i would like it more if the LOCs get under 2kloc :P
>
> On 23/10/2011, at 12:30, Pierre Chapuis <catwell_AT_archlinux.us> wrote:
>
>> On 23.10.2011 12:20, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
>>
>>> Precision: breaks *on a 64 bits machine* (gc_header_t is a pointer
>>> so gc_header_s is 8 bytes larger than GC_HEADER_SPACE).
>>
>> OK, apparently just setting GC_HEADER_SPACE to 24 makes it build
>> and run simple tests. Sorry for the noise.
>>
>
>
Received on Sun Oct 23 2011 - 14:55:52 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Oct 23 2011 - 15:00:10 CEST