On 1 November 2011 16:57, Sime Ramov <s_AT_ramov.com> wrote:
> * Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> [2011-11-01 16:49+0100]:
>> (i) It features a kind of 'static' window management model in the
>> tradition of ion/wmi(i)/i3.
>
> And that is exactly why I use it. It has perfect balance between dynamic
> and manual tiling.
Fair enough.
>> (ii) The IPC mechanism reminds me of all the mistakes I made in wmi
>> (with wmiremote) and later wmii with wmiir/libixp.
>
> Conceptually or? I am not a programmer but I prefer server/client
> software model.
Having an IPC mechnism to control and configure your WM makes the code
unnecessary more complex. Client-Server rarely makes sense if there is
only one client and one server.
Cheers,
Anselm
Received on Tue Nov 01 2011 - 17:13:32 CET
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Nov 01 2011 - 17:24:03 CET