Re: [dev] suckless document generator for C code

From: Connor Lane Smith <cls_AT_lubutu.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 19:37:17 +0100

On 11 May 2012 19:29, Galos, David <galosd83_AT_students.rowan.edu> wrote:
> Less clean than troff files for the docs, I think. And retrieval is
> definitely uglier than "man headername"

For the record, I do agree. My suggestion involving C header files was
meant as a kind of compromise between the two.

cls
Received on Fri May 11 2012 - 20:37:17 CEST