Re: [dev] any update on stali?

From: hiro <>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 22:11:23 +0200

I'm looking forward to it. I reckon you have looked at tinycore once?
They did some of the things you mentioned (for example I have tinycore
on SD and load all of it into RAM on boot). Also they have already
decided that they will sail around that systemd/d-bus disaster, so you
can see how they cope in case they switch to an udev alternative soon.

On 8/30/12, Anselm R Garbe <> wrote:
> On 23 August 2012 16:11, Joaquim Pedro França Simão <>
> wrote:
>> I wonder if there is any news about stali. I searched the mail list, but
>> had
>> no activity on this recently.
> No real news yet on stali, but the project is already on the top of my
> long TODO list. I actually consider investigating
> for stali, though not sure how useful
> it'll be.
> The point of stali I want to make is, a system that is fully
> self-contained. No package manager -- one tool for each task only. No
> fancy configuration file. No fancy user management (probably just 1
> user system).
> It should be as simple, bare and usable as possible -- and updatable
> using git or rsync or something similar over the network. Ideally the
> system won't require any disk space (should fit into the RAM +
> probably some sdcard for the config).
> Cheers,
> Anselm
Received on Thu Aug 30 2012 - 22:11:23 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Aug 30 2012 - 22:12:04 CEST