Re: [dev] [suckless] Migration to git

From: Chris Down <chris_AT_chrisdown.name>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:40:48 +0800

Care to give some examples of where git sucks more than hg? I've found it
particularly un-sucky, but non-intuitive in places.

On 13 February 2013 07:28, Sam Watkins <sam_AT_nipl.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > I am proposing a migration of all mercurial to git repositories.
>
> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things,
> and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software
> I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky...
>
> You migrated from hg to git, because *git* sucks less??? Say WHAT?!
>
>
Received on Wed Feb 13 2013 - 00:40:48 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Feb 21 2013 - 19:20:15 CET