Re: [dev] [sbase / 9base] Still working on it?

From: Carlos Torres <>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 15:12:59 -0400

sbase and 9base overlap a bit on functionality. sbase is better
suited for core. though currently it seems you should layer sbase on
top of 9base to fulfill some of sbase's TODO's. get porting :)


On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Hugues <> wrote:
> Le 27-05-2013 20:14, Carlos Torres a écrit :
>> I believe it already has what you need to replace coreutils/busybox.
>> though its not just a matter or swapping stuff. you'ld have to port
>> all the shell scripts that depend on gnuish stuff. i.e. anything that
>> uses the auto* stuff doesn't work with 9base awk and ls... but do you
>> really need stuff that uses auto* cruft?
> Hum, I see. I'm not afraid of the shell.
> But, you're talking about 9base, it should work better with sbase (even if
> gnuish stuff is missing)?
> --
> H MoV.
Received on Mon May 27 2013 - 21:12:59 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 27 2013 - 21:24:05 CEST