* Robert Ransom <rransom.8774_AT_gmail.com> [2013-07-03 10:26:03 +0000]:
> On 7/3/13, Galos, David <galosd83_AT_students.rowan.edu> wrote:
> >> Added LICENSE.lpl as well and updated the license and copyright details
> >> for
> >> the md5 code.
> >
> > I am considering applying this patch. The license is why I have to take
> > time to think. I'm worried about setting a precedent which allows external
> > differently-licensed software to be swept into sbase. It is clean code,
> > which is a large part of why I am considering it.
>
> Why not use the public-domain MD5 implementation from libtomcrypt?
>
here is a cleaned up version
http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/crypt/crypt_md5.c
the libtomcrypt version has gratuitous optimizations
ifdef configurations and useless failure modes
Received on Wed Jul 03 2013 - 13:16:35 CEST