Re: [dev] [PATCH][RFC] Add a basic version of tr

From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:16:46 +0100

> By no means was this any serious benchmarking but eliminating the function
> pointer did not seem to make an obvious difference.

Good job!!!!

> I would still go for the function-pointer-less version of the
> code since it actually is one line shorter, I think. The second,
> function-pointer-less version of the code can be found below.

I like more the version with the pointer function because you
only have a copy of the loop and because the text segment of
the executable will be smaller.

Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Received on Thu Jan 16 2014 - 10:16:46 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jan 16 2014 - 10:24:07 CET