Re: [dev] Fwd: st patches for more attrs

From: Roberto E. Vargas Caballero <>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:43:27 +0200

> Yeah. ^[[6m=>Fast blink isn't even on the (now) canonical reference

We use as canonical reference.

> I'm not really that enamored with the fastblink patch either, but I felt the
> main loop needed to suck less. Not sure if it does with this patch, but,
> well, it's at least a conversation piece.

I totally agree with you. The main loop is one of the aspect of st that
need more work.


Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
Received on Tue Jun 24 2014 - 21:43:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 24 2014 - 21:48:10 CEST