Re: [dev] [st] [PATCH] Fixed wrong nanosecond factor 10E6.

From: FRIGN <>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:07:46 +0200

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:58:34 +0200
Silvan Jegen <> wrote:

> That's ok, bugs happen (and I did not see it when the patch was sent either).
> I only noticed when I tested the patch that fixed the issue (because I
> was running a version without the problematic commit. Otherwise I
> would have complained about the change in speed ASAP :-) ).

Well, it's tempting to write 10E6 instead of 1E6.
Being a mathematician, it's almost an idiom for me to write it like
that. But instead, it acts more like a base 10 bitshift with all



Received on Thu Jun 26 2014 - 13:07:46 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jun 26 2014 - 13:12:11 CEST