On 12.10.15, Chris Down wrote:
> I took a quick look at the code, but I didn't see any obvious reason
> for this. I will look a bit further and supply a patch if I work it
> out, but if anyone else has any ideas I'd be glad to hear them.
The attached patch fixes the problem.
Enjoy,
Bert
Received on Tue Oct 13 2015 - 10:12:36 CEST