Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 22:38:49 +0200

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:01:43 -0800
Britton Kerin <britton.kerin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:

>

the right format is

<project>-<patchname>-<version>.diff

for release patches. Now do some work and change it to that...
Use the st patches as reference, they are correct and have been
agreed upon.

Cheers

FRIGN

-- 
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>

Received on Fri Jun 17 2016 - 22:38:49 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Connor Lane Smith: "Re: [dev] Different versions of suckless libutf"
Previous message: Britton Kerin: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?"
In reply to: Britton Kerin: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?"
Next in thread: Britton Kerin: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?"
Reply: Britton Kerin: "Re: [dev] which versions are dwm patches intended to apply to cleanly?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Jun 17 2016 - 22:48:12 CEST